• maiweb v0.1.0
  • ★
  • Feedback

The Catsters

active · last success 2026-06-19 22:12

Visit site ↗ · Feed ↗

  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2014-01-17 18:12
    ↗

    Looking at Nat |Id,Id| for the category of M-Sets when M is a monoid and contrasting this with Nat |U,U| where U: M-Set to Set is the forgetful functor.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Looking at Nat |Id,Id| for the category of M-Sets when M is a monoid and contrasting this with Nat |U,U| where U: M-Set to Set is the forgetful functor.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2014-01-10 18:37
    ↗

    A couple more examples of ends. Firstly, otaining Nat |F,G| as an end. Secondly, a baby example of Tannakian reconstruction: if M is a monoid in Set, and U is the forgetful functor from M-Set to Set then Nat |U,U| = M.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    A couple more examples of ends. Firstly, otaining Nat |F,G| as an end. Secondly, a baby example of Tannakian reconstruction: if M is a monoid in Set, and U is the forgetful functor from M-Set to Set then Nat |U,U| = M.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2014-01-08 15:05
    ↗

    The first example of an end. Natural transformations of the identity as the end of the hom functor.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    The first example of an end. Natural transformations of the identity as the end of the hom functor.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2014-01-08 14:24
    ↗

    The definition of a categorical end

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    The definition of a categorical end
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2010-07-23 19:20
    ↗

    A first look at generalizing the notion of natural transformation to the enriched setting.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    A first look at generalizing the notion of natural transformation to the enriched setting.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2009-03-03 20:10
    ↗

    Statement of Yoneda lemma and explanation of "why" it is true

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Statement of Yoneda lemma and explanation of "why" it is true
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2009-02-26 15:10
    ↗

    Further explanation of the Yoneda embedding (including calling it that, but not yet proving it's an embedding), checking naturality for H_f.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Further explanation of the Yoneda embedding (including calling it that, but not yet proving it's an embedding), checking naturality for H_f.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2009-02-26 11:09
    ↗

    Definition of representable functors and the Yoneda embedding (though without calling it the Yoneda embedding yet)

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Definition of representable functors and the Yoneda embedding (though without calling it the Yoneda embedding yet)
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-12-09 14:12
    ↗

    Definition of comma categories D over and under F for a functor F, and F over and under G for functors F and G with the same target category

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Definition of comma categories D over and under F for a functor F, and F over and under G for functors F and G with the same target category
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-11-04 14:13
    ↗

    Definition of slice categories C/X and X/C, products in C/X as pullbacks in C

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Definition of slice categories C/X and X/C, products in C/X as pullbacks in C
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-10-07 12:50
    ↗

    Quotient groups as coequalisers in the category of groups

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Quotient groups as coequalisers in the category of groups
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-09-29 10:59
    ↗

    Definition of coequaliser, examples in Set: coequalisers can be constructed as equivalence relations, and equivalence relations can be expressed as coequalisers

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Definition of coequaliser, examples in Set: coequalisers can be constructed as equivalence relations, and equivalence relations can be expressed as coequalisers
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-09-21 19:07
    ↗

    Description of the left adjoint to the pull-back

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    Description of the left adjoint to the pull-back
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-09-21 17:19
    ↗

    A proof that the push-forward is right adjont to pull-back.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    A proof that the push-forward is right adjont to pull-back.
  • The Catsters youtube.com channel math video youtube 2008-09-16 16:11
    ↗

    The definition of the pull-back and its right adjoint for bundles over sets.

    ▶ Watch on YouTube Opens in a new tab
    The definition of the pull-back and its right adjoint for bundles over sets.
  • End of feed
Maibook — your private personalized AI community
  • rcanand.com
  • mlaillc.com
  • @rcanand (X)
  • LinkedIn
  • Feedback
  • Credits